GeMS validation of DAMAS2025.1.gdb

File written by GeMS_ValidateDatabase.py, version of 02/19/2025
Wed Dec 31 16:04:33 2025
Runtime parameters
Database path: \MD_2022_Damascus2025.1_1-2-submittal\MD_2022_Damascus2025.1_1-2\MD_2022_Damascus2025.1_1-2-database\DAMAS2025.1.gdb
Output directory: \MD_2022_Damascus2025.1_1-2-submittal
Metadata file: None
Check embedded metadata: False
Skip topology check: False
Refresh GeoMaterialDict: False
Delete extra rows in Glossary and DataSources: False
Compact GDB: True

This database is LEVEL 3 COMPLIANT.

Check Metadata option was skipped. Be sure to have prepared valid metadata and check this option to produce a complete report.
This file should be accompanied by Damascus.gdb-ValidationErrors.html and a metadata summary from mp in the same directory.

If this database will be submitted to the NGMDB, it also needs to be accompanied by a reviewed Geologic Names report that includes identification of any suggested modifications to Geolex. Use the Geologic Names Check tool to generate that report or provide other documentation of a review.

Back to Top

Contents

Compliance Criteria
Warnings
Content not specified in GeMS schema
Occurrence of MapUnits in DMU, feature datasets, or geopackage tables
Contents of Nonspatial Tables
DataSources
DescriptionOfMapUnits
Glossary
Database Inventory

Compliance Criteria

LEVEL 1

Criteria for a LEVEL 1 GeMS database are: Databases with a variety of schema may meet these criteria. This script cannot confirm LEVEL 1 compliance.

LEVEL 2--MINIMALLY COMPLIANT

A LEVEL 2 GeMS database is accompanied by a peer-reviewed Geologic Names report, including identification of suggested modifications to Geolex, and meets the following criteria:
2.1 Has required elements: nonspatial tables DataSources, DescriptionOfMapUnits, GeoMaterialDict; feature dataset GeologicMap with feature classes ContactsAndFaults and MapUnitPolys PASS
2.2 Required fields within required elements are present and correctly defined PASS
2.3 All MapUnitPolys and ContactsAndFaults based feature classes obey Level 2 topology rules: no internal gaps or overlaps in MapUnitPolys, boundaries of MapUnitPolys are covered by ContactsAndFaults PASS
2.4 All map units in MapUnitPolys have entries in DescriptionOfMapUnits table PASS
2.5 No duplicate MapUnit values in DescriptionOfMapUnit table PASS
2.6 Certain field values within required elements have entries in Glossary table PASS
2.7 No duplicate Term values in Glossary table PASS
2.8 All xxxSourceID values in required elements have entries in DataSources table PASS
2.9 No duplicate DataSources_ID values in DataSources table PASS

LEVEL 3--FULLY COMPLIANT

A LEVEL 3 GeMS database meets these additional criteria:
3.1 Table and field definitions beyond Level 2 conform to GeMS schema PASS
3.2 All MapUnitPolys and ContactsAndFaults based feature classes obey Level 3 topology rules: No ContactsAndFaults overlaps, self-overlaps, or self-intersections. PASS
3.3 No missing required values PASS
3.4 No missing terms in Glossary PASS
3.5 No unnecessary terms in Glossary PASS
3.6 No missing sources in DataSources PASS
3.7 No unnecessary sources in DataSources PASS
3.8 No map units without entries in DescriptionOfMapUnits PASS
3.9 No unnecessary map units in DescriptionOfMapUnits PASS
3.10 HierarchyKey values in DescriptionOfMapUnits are unique and well formed PASS
3.11 All values of GeoMaterial are defined in GeoMaterialDict. GeoMaterialDict is as specified in the GeMS standard PASS
3.12 No duplicate _ID values PASS
3.13 No zero-length, whitespace-only, or bad null values PASS

Warnings

There are 0 warnings

Content not specified in GeMS schema

Some of the extensions to the GeMS schema identified here may be necessary to capture geologic content and are entirely appropriate. Please document these extensions in metadata for the database, any accompanying README file, and (if applicable) any transmittal letter that accompanies the dataset. Other extensions may be intermediate datasets, fields, or files that should be deleted before distribution of the database.

Fields


SamplePoints, FieldSampleID
OrientationPoints_Display, OrientationPointsAllID

Tables


SamplePoints

Occurrence of MapUnit in DMU, feature datasets, or geopackage tables

MapUnit DescriptionOfMapUnits GeologicMap
CZscp X X
CZmbq X X
CZmbp X X
CZscb X X
CZmg X X
Jd X X
Qal X X
CZOq X X
CZmbg X X
CZmgs X X
CZum X X
CZmbs X X
CZmbcp X X
CZi X X

Contents of Nonspatial Tables

DataSources

OBJECTIDSourceNotesURLDataSources_ID
6Neuendorf et al., eds., 2011modified from Neuendorf, K.K.E., Mehl Jr., J.P., and Jackson, J.A., eds. 2011. Glossary of Geology (Fifth Edition, Revised). Alexandria, VA. American Geological Institute. 783 p.https://www.americangeosciences.org/pubs/glossaryAGI_2011
5FGDC, 2006Federal Geographic Data Committee [prepared for the Federal Geographic Data Committee by the U.S. Geological Survey], 2006, FGDC Digital Cartographic Standard for Geologic Map Symbolization: Reston, Va., Federal Geographic Data Committee Document Number FGDC-STD-013-2006, 290 p., 2 plates.https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/fgdc_gds/geolsymstd.phpFGDC-STD-013-2006
4definitions copied from GeMS, 2020U.S. Geological Survey National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program, 2020, GeMS (Geologic Map Schema)—A standard format for the digital publication of geologic maps: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, book 11, chap. B10, 74 p., https://doi.org//10.3133/tm11B10.https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/tm11B10GeMS_2020
19Wintsch et al., 2010Wintsch, R.P., Kunk, M.J., Mulvey, B.K., and Southworth, C.S., 2010, 40Ar/39Ar dating of Silurian and Late Devonian cleavages in lower greenschist-facies rocks in the Westminster terrane, Maryland, USA: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 122, no. 5–6, p. 658–677.https://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-abstract/122/5-6/658/125487/40Ar-39Ar-dating-of-Silurian-and-Late-Devonian?redirectedFrom=fulltextGSA_Bull_v122_658
18Krol et al., 1999Krol, M.A., Muller, P.D., and Idleman, B.D., 1999, Late Paleozoic defor- mation within the Pleasant Grove shear zone, Maryland: Results from 40Ar/39Ar dating of white mica, in Valentino, D.W., and Gates, A.E., eds., The Mid-Atlantic Piedmont: Tectonic Missing Link of the Appalachians: Geological Sochttps://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/books/edited-volume/475/chapter-abstract/3799965/Late-Paleozoic-deformation-within-the-Pleasant?redirectedFrom=fulltextGSA_SP_330_93
15Meyer and Beall, 1958Meyer, G., and Beall, R.M., 1958, The water resources of Carroll and Frederick Counties: Maryland Department of Geology, Mines, and Water Resources, Bulletin 22, 355 p.http://www.mgs.md.gov/publications/reports.htmlMGS_Bull_22
10Jonas, 1928Jonas, A.I., 1928, Map of Carroll County showing the geological formations: Maryland Geological Survey, scale 1:62,500.https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/Prodesc/proddesc_90331.htmMGS_CLGEO1928
16Stose and Stose, 1946Stose, A.J., and Stose, G.W., 1946, Geology of Carroll and Frederick Counties, in The Physical Features of Carroll County and Frederick County: Maryland Department of Geology, Mines, and Water Resources, p. 11-131.http://www.mgs.md.gov/publications/report_pages/County_Reports.htmlMGS_CR_CLFR1946
1Kavage Adams, 2025this reporthttp://www.mgs.md.gov/publications/maps.htmlMGS_DAMAS2025.1
21Muller, 1994Muller, P.D., 1994, Geologic map of the Finksburg Quadrangle, Carroll and Baltimore Counties: Maryland Geological Survey, scale 1:24,000.http://www.mgs.md.gov/publications/maps.htmlMGS_FINKS1994
12Jonas and Stose, 1938Jonas, A.I., and Stose, G.W., 1938a. Geologic map of Frederick County and adjacent parts of Washington and Carroll Counties: Maryland Geological Survey, scale 1:62,500.https://ngmdb.usgs.gov/Prodesc/proddesc_90332.htmMGS_FRWACL1938
11Cloos, et al., 1964Cloos, E., Fisher, G. W., Hopson, C. A., and Cleaves, E. T., 1964, The geology of Howard and Montgomery Counties: Maryland Geological Survey, 373p.http://www.mgs.md.gov/publications/report_pages/County_Reports.htmlMGS_HOWMO1964
17Brezinski and Kavage Adams, 2023Brezinski, D.K., and Kavage Adams, R., 2023. Geologic Map of the Libertytown Quadrangle, Frederick and Carroll Counties, Maryland. Maryland Geological Survey, Quadrangle Geologic Map, LIBER2023.OF, scale 1:24,000.http://www.mgs.md.gov/publications/maps.htmlMGS_LIBER2023.OF
8Cloos, 1953Cloos, E., and Cooke, C.W., 1953, Geologic map of Montgomery County and the District of Columbia: Maryland Department of Geology, Mines and Water Resources, scale 1:62,500.http://www.mgs.md.gov/publications/maps.htmlMGS_MODC1953
2Kavage Adams, R., field observationsKavage Adams, R., field data collection and interpretationsNoneMGS_RKA
3Vincett III, W.K., field observationsVincett III, W.K., field data collection and interpretationsNoneMGS_WKV
20Krol and Muller, 1995Krol, M.A., and Muller, P.D., 1995, Microstructural evidence for dextral shearing within the Pleasant Grove Zone, Maryland: Northeastern Geology and Environmental Sciences, v. 17, no. 2, p. 151-161.NoneNEGEOENV_v17_151
22Pearre and Heyl, 1960Pearre, N.C., and Heyl, A.V., 1960, Chromite and other mineral deposits in serpentine rocks of the Piedmont upland, Maryland, Pennsylvania, and Delaware: U.S.Geological Survey Bulletin 1082-K, p. 707-833, plate 40, scale 1:125,000.https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/b1082KUSGS_Bull_1082K_707
14Southworth, 1999Southworth, S., 1999, Geologic map of the Urbana quadrangle, Frederick and Montgomery Counties, Maryland: U.S. Geological Survey Geologic Quadrangle Map GQ-1768, scale 1:24,000.https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/gq1768USGS_GQ_1768
9Froelich, 1975Froelich, A.J., 1975, Map showing mineral resources of Montgomery County, Maryland: U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Investigations Series, Map I-920-E, scale 1:62,500.https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/i920EUSGS_IMAP920_MO1975
13Meyer, 1955Meyer, G., 1955, Test drilling and aquifer test in the Marburg schist near Mount Airy, Frederick County, Maryland: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 55-110, 31 p.https://pubs.usgs.gov/publication/ofr55110USGS_OFR_55-110
7Southworth et al, 2008Southworth, S., Brezinski, D.K., Drake, A.A., Burton, W.C., Omdorff, R.C., Froelich, A.J., Reddy, J.E., Denenny, D., and Daniels, D.L., 2008, Geologic map of the Frederick 30' x 60' quadrangle, Maryland, Virginia, and West Virginia: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map SIM-2889, scalhttps://pubs.usgs.gov/sim/2889/USGS_SIM_2889_FREDERICK

DescriptionOfMapUnits

OBJECTIDMapUnitNameFullNameAgeDescriptionHierarchyKeyParagraphStyleLabelSymbolAreaFillRGBAreaFillPatternDescriptionDescriptionSourceIDGeoMaterialGeoMaterialConfidenceDescriptionOfMapUnits_ID
2QalAlluviumAlluviumQuarternaryPoorly- to well-sorted, stratified mixtures of unconsolidated clay, silt, sand, gravel, and cobbles underlying flood plains of nearly all rivers and tributaries. Channels of tributaries are commonly incised into bedrock with alluvium covering and exposed along the banks. Thickness of alluvium is highly variable, and is a function of bedrock, topography, and land-use practices. Locally, thick deposits of alluvium result from accumulation of soil eroded due to agricultural practices of the 19th century (Southworth et al., 2008). Notably thick (>7 ft) and laterally extensive (>400 ft wide) deposits of alluvium are present in Cabin Branch and Kings Valley.01-01DMU Unit 1Qal40255,255,179NoneMGS_DAMAS2025.1|USGS_SIM_2889_FREDERICKAlluvial sedimentHighDMU01
3JdDiabase dikes and sillsDiabase dikes and sillsJurassicMedium to dark gray, medium-grained crystalline and equigranular, massive diabase that weathers to characteristic rusty orange-brown surface and rounded boulders. One linear dike from south of Damascus to northeast of Mount Airy mapped on presence of rounded boulders in stream valleys and previous maps (Cloos and Cooke, 1953; Froelich, 1975; Jonas, 1928; Stose and Stose, 1946).02-01DMU Unit 1Jd99255,000,000NoneMGS_DAMAS2025.1|MGS_MODC1953|USGS_IMAP920_MO1975|MGS_CLGEO1928|MGS_CR_CLFR1946Coarse-grained, mafic-composition intrusive igneous rockHighDMU02
4CZOqQuartz bodiesQuartz bodiesProterozoic-OrdovicianWhite, massive, and intensely fractured irregular bodies of quartz. The largest, Annapolis Rock, is over 100 feet thick and was once quarried (Cloos et al., 1964). It occurs just east of the Pautuxent River in the Mather Gorge Formation. Four other smaller (6-12 ft thick) quartz bodies are found in the Marburg Formation.03-01DMU Unit 1_ZOq179235,000,102NoneMGS_DAMAS2025.1|MGS_HOWMO1964QuartziteLowDMU03
5NoneSams Creek FormationSams Creek FormationNoneNone04DMU-Heading1NoneNoneNoneNoneMGS_DAMAS2025.1NoneNoneDMU04
6CZscbSams Creek Formation, metabasaltSams Creek Formation, metabasaltProterozoic-CambrianGreenish gray to medium bluish gray, aphanitic to porphyritic, massive to schistose metabasalt. Includes some breccia composed of angular, fine-grained, dusky blue clasts in fractured green basalt matrix, as well as interlaminated, fine-grained, dark bluish gray and greenish gray metabasalt and white calcite amygdules. Metabasalt is mapped based on float found just northeast of the map area on the Libertytown quadrangle.04-01DMU Unit 1_Zscb344204,179,179NoneMGS_DAMAS2025.1Meta-mafic rockHighDMU05
7CZscpSams Creek Formation, phylliteSams Creek Formation, phylliteProterozoic-CambrianGrayish purple, grayish blue, and dark greenish gray phyllite containing white vein quartz and minor slate. No exposures were found on the Damascus Quadrangle; it is mapped based on Libertytown Quadrangle exposures (Jonas and Stose, 1938; Meyer, 1955; Southworth, 1999).04-02DMU Unit 1_Zscp153235,204,153NoneMGS_DAMAS2025.1|MGS_FRWACL1938|USGS_OFR_55-110|USGS_GQ_1768Meta-felsic and intermediate rockHighDMU06
8CZiIjamsville Phyllite, undifferentiatedIjamsville Phyllite, undifferentiatedProterozoic-CambrianGrayish purple, grayish blue, and dark greenish gray phyllite containing white vein quartz and minor slate. Folded and sheared with abundant quartz veins near the Hyattstown fault. No exposures were found on the Damascus Quadrangle; it is mapped based on Libertytown Quadrangle exposures (Brezinski and Kavage Adams, 2023).05DMU Unit 1_Zi312204,222,235NoneMGS_DAMAS2025.1|MGS_LIBER2023.OFMeta-felsic and intermediate rockHighDMU07
9NoneMarburg FormationMarburg FormationNoneNone06DMU-Heading1NoneNoneNoneNoneMGS_DAMAS2025.1NoneNoneDMU08
10CZmbpMarburg Formation, phylliteMarburg Formation, phylliteProterozoic-CambrianSilvery light gray to grayish purple, lustrous, tan-weathering, muscovite-chlorite phyllite interlayered with greenish gray metasiltstone. Coarsens gradationally to the east with corresponding decrease in luster.06-01DMU Unit 1_Zmbp242222,222,179NoneMGS_DAMAS2025.1Slate and phyllite, of sedimentary-rock originHighDMU09
11CZmbsMarburg Formation, metasiltstoneMarburg Formation, metasiltstoneProterozoic-CambrianMedium to dark greenish gray metasiltstone interlayered with quartz-paragonite-muscovite-chlorite phyllite. Chloritic laminae commonly alternate with mica-albite-quartz layers. Locally, intervals of dark grayish blue to dark grayish purple phyllite with light gray, quartz-rich layers occur, containing minute (>0.01mm) disseminated flakes of hematite and pyrite. Much of the apparent layering is clearly metamorphic cleavage, but some may be relict bedding.06-02DMU Unit 1_Zmbs263222,204,128NoneMGS_DAMAS2025.1Slate and phyllite, of sedimentary-rock originHighDMU10
12CZmbqMarburg Formation, quartziteMarburg Formation, quartziteProterozoic-CambrianLight to medium olive gray, medium- to coarse-grained quartzite. Can be foliated, blocky, or massive. Massive intervals are up to 3 feet thick and comprised of subrounded quartz grains in a foliated, fine-grained, recrystallized quartz and mica matrix. Coarse grains of quartz appear bluish in hand sample and euhedral limonite pseudomorphs after pyrite are occasionally present.06-03DMU Unit 1_Zmbq404179,179,255NoneMGS_DAMAS2025.1QuartziteHighDMU11
13CZmbgMarburg Formation, metagraywackeMarburg Formation, metagraywackeProterozoic-CambrianDark grayish green, foliated metagraywacke comprised of very fine- to fine-grained quartz and plagioclase grains in a chlorite-rich matrix. The largest of these bodies occurs west of Mount Airy. In this location, dark green layers of metagraywacke are divided by 1-3 mm-thick, parallel bands of muscovite and chlorite, forming a crenulation cleavage that indicates compressional folding.06-04DMU Unit 1_Zmbg304204,179,255NoneMGS_DAMAS2025.1QuartziteHighDMU12
14NoneMarburg Formation, calcareous materialMarburg Formation, calcareous materialProterozoic-CambrianCalcareous material found in bluish green schist in well cuttings at approximately 50-foot depth in a well field in Mount Airy (Meyer, 1955; Meyer and Beall, 1958). No surficial exposures were found on the Damascus Quadrangle, but may be related to limestone or marble associated with the Ijamsville Formation (Stose and Stose, 1946; Brezinski and Kavage Adams, 2023) or the Silver Run Limestone of the Sams Creek Formation (Stose and Stose, 1946; Fisher, 1978).06-05DMU Unit 2NoneNoneNoneNoneMGS_DAMAS2025.1|USGS_OFR_55-110|MGS_Bull_22|MGS_CR_CLFR1946|MGS_LIBER2023.OFMeta-carbonate rockMediumDMU13
15CZmbcpMarburg Formation, chlorite phylloniteMarburg Formation, chlorite phylloniteProterozoic-CambrianGreenish gray, chlorite-sericite phyllonite containing white vein quartz. Foliation surfaces frequently have abundant euhedral magnetite grains ranging from 0.04 to 0.2 inch (1 to 5 mm) in size. 100- to 300-foot (30- to 90-m) wide zones of intense shear are exposed in NE-SW trending ridges cut by the Patuxent River and Scott Branch and marked with wavy lines as seen in lower half of symbol. Sheared outcrops display pervasive S-C shear fabric and thin (0.04- to 0.16-inch / 1- to 4-mm), linear, quartz ribbons that are often isoclinally folded. S-C shear bands on outcrop indicate dextral sense of shear. 40Ar/39Ar dating of white mica in this zone yielded ages of 348 and 363 mya, indicating late Devonian-Mississippian deformation (Krol et al., 1999; Wintsch et al., 2010).06-06DMU Unit 1_Zmbcp584153,179,077NoneMGS_DAMAS2025.1|GSA_SP_330_93|GSA_Bull_v122_658Slate and phyllite, of sedimentary-rock originHighDMU14
17CZmgMather Gorge FormationMather Gorge FormationProterozoic-CambrianQuartz-mica schist and quartzitic metagraywacke interbedded in layers and lenses on a millimeter to meter scale. Quartz-muscovite-chlorite-plagioclase-epidote-magnetite-garnet schist is fine-grained, lustrous greenish gray to gray. Metagraywacke is light to dark olive gray, fine- to medium-grained, with quartz pebbles and graded bedding occasionally visible. Stringers and pods of isoclinally folded and boudinaged white quartz veins are abundant.07DMU-Heading1_Zmg185235,153,077NoneMGS_DAMAS2025.1Schist and gneiss, of sedimentary-rock originHighDMU15
18CZmgsMather Gorge Formation, shearedMather Gorge Formation, shearedProterozoic-CambrianInterbedded quartz-mica schist and quartzitic metagraywacke with penetrative S-C metamorphic fabric, formed by the intersection of the dominant foliation (S) and the shear plane (C) near the Pleasant Grove Fault (Krol and Muller, 1995; Muller, 1994). Mapped on distinct appearance of rotated foliation although lithologically is similar to _Zmg.07-01DMU Unit 1_Zmgs184235,179,077NoneMGS_DAMAS2025.1|NEGEOENV_v17_151|MGS_FINKS1994Schist and gneiss, of sedimentary-rock originHighDMU16
19CZumUltramafic and mafic rocksUltramafic and mafic rocksProterozoic-CambrianUndifferentiated serpentine, magnesian schist, and metagabbro that occur within rocks of the Mather Gorge Formation. The core of the largest body is comprised of light gray to light greenish gray, magnesite-talc schist with yellow, native sulfur and dark green bodies of serpentinite with a distinctive, rounded, fractured weathering surface. Surrounding this body is fine- to coarse-grained actinolite, chlorite, and epidote schist containing 5-30 mm euhedral porphryoblasts of magnesite, chlorite, and magnetite. A second smaller body is mapped based on mine records and previous maps (Froelich, 1975; Pearre and Heyl, 1960), although no outcrop is presently visible at the surface.07-02DMU Unit 1_Zum442179,222,179NoneMGS_DAMAS2025.1|USGS_IMAP920_MO1975|USGS_Bull_1082K_707Meta-ultramafic rockHighDMU17

Glossary

OBJECTIDTermDefinitionDefinitionSourceIDGlossary_ID
15beddingFormed, arranged, or deposited in layers or beds, or made up of or occurring in the form of beds; esp. said of a layered sedimentary rock, deposit, or formation. The term has also been applied to nonsedimentary material that exhibits depositional layering, such as the "bedded deposits" of volcanic tuff alternating with lava in the mantle of a stratovolcano.AGI_2011GLO12
1certainIdentity of a feature can be determined using relevant observations and scientific judgment; therefore, one can be reasonably confident in the credibility of this interpretation.FGDC-STD-013-2006GLO01
16cleavageA locally planar fabric in an unmetamorphosed or weakly metamorphosed, fine-grained rock defined by either the tendency of a rock to split in a particular direction, a preferred orientation of crystal planes in mineral grains, or a preferred orientation of inequant grain shapes; it is a product of deformation or metamorphism.AGI_2011GLO13
14contactA plane or irregular surface between two different types or ages of rock, sediment or other geologic and stratigraphic units.AGI_2011GLO11
12cross section lineA plane or polyline along which a diagram is drawn showing the transected subsurface and topographic features and geology; specifically a vertical section drawn at right angles to the longer axis of a geologic feature.AGI_2011GLO10
10DMU-Heading1Header, bolded text, all capitals no indent, 11pt Times New Roman font, 5pt indent. This format is used for groups or headings of formations (with members or subunits) where no group is present.MGS_DAMAS2025.1GLO08
8DMU Unit 1Formation style, bolded title, 11pt Times New Roman font. This format is used for largest unit descriptions, usually formations; mapped at the surface, and may or may not contain subunits.MGS_DAMAS2025.1GLO06
9DMU Unit 2Minor lithology style. Text description within higher-order units, 11 pt Times New Roman font, italicized for subsurface-only units.MGS_DAMAS2025.1GLO07
17faultA discrete surface or zone of discrete surfaces separating two rock masses across which one mass has slid past the other.AGI_2011GLO14
20fold axisA line which, when moved parallel to itself, traces out a folded surface. It applies only in the case of cylindrical folds.AGI_2011GLO17
21foliationA general term for a planar arrangement of textural or structural geatures in any type of rock, esp. the locally planar fabric in a rock defined by a fissility, a preferred orientation of crystal planes in mineral grains, a preferred orientation of inequant grain shapes, or from compositional banding. In igneous rocks, planar parallelism of flaky or tabular minerals and mineral aggregates, slabby xenoliths, or flattened vesicles as well as compositional layering. In metamorphic rocks, planar parallelism of flaky minerals and compositional layering.AGI_2011GLO18
3HighThe selected term in the GeoMaterial field (and its definition) adequately characterizes the overall lithologic nature of rocks and (or) sediments in the map unit.GeMS_2020GLO03
22jointA planar fracture, crack, or parting in a rock, without shear displacement.AGI_2011GLO19
23lineationA general, nongeneric term for a locally linear structure or facric in a rock, e.g. flow lines, scratches, striae, slickensides or slickenfibers on a single surface; linear arrangements of components in sediments; or axes of folds. Lineation in metamorphic rocks includes aligned rod-shaped and/or elongate mineral grains, crenulation fold axes, and the lines of intersection between bedding and cleavage or any two sets of oriented surfaces.AGI_2011GLO20
7LowEither (1) the overall lithologic nature of rocks and (or) sediments in this map unit is not adequately classifiable using the available list of GeoMaterial terms (and their definitions), but the selected term is the best available, or (2) this map unit is not sufficiently known enough to confidently assign a GeoMaterial term.GeMS_2020GLO05
4MediumThe selected term in the GeoMaterial field (and its definition) generally characterizes the overall lithologic nature of rocks and (or) sediments in the map unit, but one or more significant but minor lithologies are not adequately described by the selected term.GeMS_2020GLO04
11neatlineMap OutlineMGS_DAMAS2025.1GLO09
2questionableIdentity of a feature cannot be determined using relevant observations and scientific judgment; therefore, one cannot be reasonably confident in the credibility of this interpretation. For example, IdentityConfidence = questionable is appropriate when a geologist reasons "I can see some kind of planar feature that separates map units in this outcrop, but I cannot be certain if it is a contact or a fault."FGDC-STD-013-2006GLO02
25recreational GPSData collected using Apple iPad using GIS software such as ESRI Field Maps or IGIS with settings of 30 ft point accuracy.MGS_DAMAS2025.1GLO22
18right lateral faultA strike-slip fault on which the side opposite the observer has been displaced to the right. Synonym: dextral fault. The Pleasant Grove Fault, which is labeled as a right lateral fault on this map, is interpreted as an older potential thrust fault that has been reactivated as a strike-slip. The older potential thrust fault is referenced by vertical arrows on the cross section.AGI_2011|MGS_DAMAS2025.1GLO15
26sampleField collected piece or pieces of rock, weathered rock, saprolite, or soil sent for geochemical analysis.MGS_DAMAS2025.1GLO23
24shear zoneA parallel-sided zone of localized shearing displacement, which may be recognized by sigmoidal mineral-filled veins, locally well-developed cleavage or foliation, wholesale grain-size reduction or mylonitization, or some combination of these features.AGI_2011GLO21
19thrust faultA fault with a dip of 45° or less over much of its extent, on which the hanging wall has moved upward relative to the footwall.AGI_2011GLO16

Database Inventory

This summary of database content is provided as a convenience to GIS analysts, reviewers, and others. It is not part of the GeMS compliance criteria.

DataSources, nonspatial table, 22 rows
DescriptionOfMapUnits, nonspatial table, 17 rows
GeoMaterialDict, nonspatial table, 101 rows
Glossary, nonspatial table, 23 rows
GeologicMap, feature dataset
SamplePoints, simple point feature class, 32 rows
MapUnitPolys, simple polygon feature class, 43 rows
MapUnitOverlayPolys, simple polygon feature class, 24 rows
OverlayPolys, simple polygon feature class, 6 rows
CartographicLines, simple polyline feature class, 1 rows
ContactsAndFaults, simple polyline feature class, 277 rows
Stations, simple point feature class, 621 rows
OrientationPoints_All, simple point feature class, 617 rows
OrientationPoints_Display, simple point feature class, 323 rows